FREEDOM OF RELIGION

·        Freedom of religion is a political principle that strives to forbid government constraint on people's choices of beliefs. It requires also that people be free to act upon their beliefs. Religious freedom includes the freedom to worship, to print instructional material, to train teachers and to organize groups for their employment and schools in which to teach, including religion.

·        The first sixteen words of the First Amendment to the Constitution deal with freedom of religion. These words reflect the deep concern that the founders of The American nation had about the relationship between church and state, and about the right of individuals to practice their religion freely. Many of the colonists fled religious persecution in their former countries and cherished their right to worship, as they believed in their new country.

·        Religious freedom is protected by two clauses in the First Amendment: the establishment clause and the free exercise clause. The establishment clause reads: "Congress shall make no law respecting any establishment of religion." It has been interpreted to mean that the government is prohibited from setting up a state religion. It also prohibits the government from endorsing or supporting religion and from showing preference to any particular religion. The establishment clause requires a complete separation of church and state.

·        Cases involving the establishment clause have been among the most controversial to reach the Supreme Court of the U.S. They are particularly complex when they involve aid to parochial schools or prayer in public schools. Over the years, the Court has approved some forms of aid to parochial school students and their parents (for example, bus transportation, loan of textbooks). However, the aid may not include direct financial assistance to a religious institution or its instructors. The Court has held that public school-sponsored prayer violates the establishment clause. Even voluntary school-sponsored prayer (or school-sponsored daily Bible reading or recitation of the Lord's Prayer) has been found to be unconstitutional.

·        The free exercise clause in the First Amendment protects the right of individuals to worship as they choose. It prohibits the Congress from passing any law prohibiting the "free exercise thereof." The clause should not be interpreted to mean absolute right to a course of conduct just because it is permitted by one's religion. The Supreme Court has held that religious freedom must give way to reasonable restrictions that have been adopted to protect the health, safety and convenience of the entire community.

·        The establishment and free clauses are closely related and often come into conflict. Ensuring that a law does not establish a religion can interfere with free exercise of religion and sometimes with freedom of speech. Consider the case of evangelical Christian student group at a state university which applied for funding for its student publication. The university funded other student groups through this funding process. In order to avoid what it feared might become establishment of religion issue (by funding religious publication), the university refused the funding request. In 1995, the Supreme Court said that the university had to treat religious and nonreligious activities equally for funding purposes. The Court held that failure to treat religious publication equally was a violation of freedom of speech.

Learn more about freedom of religion by visiting the following Web sites:

Religious Tolerance

Religious Freedom

Historic Supreme Court Decisions

FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF PRESS

·        The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, says that "Congress shall make no law....abridging (limiting) the freedom of speech, or of the press..." Freedom of speech is the liberty to speak openly without fear of government restraint. It is closely linked to freedom of the press because this freedom includes both the right to speak and the right to be heard. In the United States, both the freedom of speech and freedom of press are commonly called freedom of expression.

·        The First Amendment's protection of speech and expression is central to the concept of American democracy. The core purpose of the freedom of speech is self-governance: enabling people to obtain information from a diversity of sources, make decisions, and communicate those decisions to the government. Beyond the political purpose of free speech, the First Amendment provides American people with a "marketplace of ideas." Rather than having the government establish and dictate the truth, freedom of speech enables the truth to emerge from diverse opinions

·        While the language of the First Amendment appears absolute, freedom of speech is not an absolute right. Certain limitations and restrictions apply. Conflicts involving freedom of expression are among the most difficult ones that courts are asked to resolve. Free speech cases frequently involve a clash of fundamental values. For example, how should the law respond to a speaker who makes unpopular statement to which the listeners react violently? Should police arrest the speaker or try to control the crowd? Courts must balance the need for peace and order against the fundamental right to express ones point of view.

·        Freedom of speech does not protect:

Speech that contains "fighting words" (insulting or abusive language that is likely to cause "an immediate violent response");

Obscenities;

Language or communication directed to inciting, producing or urging the commission of a crime;

Defamation - words or communication that are false and untrue and are intended to injure the character and reputation of another person;

Abusive, obscene or harassing telephone calls;

Loud speech and loud noise meant by volume to disturb others or to create a clear and present danger of violence.

·        Freedom of the press protects the right to obtain and publish information or opinions without government censorship or fear of punishment. Censorship occurs when the government examines publications and productions and prohibits the use of material it finds offensive. Freedom of press applies to all types of printed and broadcast material, including books, newspapers, magazines, pamphlets, films and radio and television programs.

·        The Constitution's framers provided the press with broad freedom. This freedom was considered necessary to the establishment of a strong, independent press sometimes called "the fourth branch" of the government. An independent press can provide citizens with a variety of information and opinions on matters of public importance. However, freedom of press sometimes collides with other rights, such as a defendant's right to a fair trial or a citizen's right to privacy. In recent years, there has been increasing concern about extremely aggressive journalism, including stories about people's sexual lives and photographs of people when they were in a private setting.

·        It would be incorrect to assume that governments do not have any control over freedom of press. This control can be exercised in preventing the press from publishing information, keeping the press from obtaining the information, and forcing the press to disclose information. In the U.S. and most other democratic countries, these forms of control are very limited. However, the government may indirectly prohibit publishing by punishing those who publish materials considered seditious, libelous or obscene. Also, the government may deny the public access to information affecting national defense or foreign policy, personnel and medical files, trade secrets, investigation records, and other confidential information. Under some circumstances the government can also require the press to disclose information (for example, information about a crime).

Learn more about freedom of speech and freedom of press by visiting the following Web sites:

American Communication Association Free Speech Page

First Amendment Cyber Tribune

Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press

Historic Supreme Court Decisions - Freedom of Speech

Historic Supreme Court Decisions - Freedom of Press

FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY

·        The right to peaceful assembly involves the right of people to assemble in public places. People are entitled to assemble and to speak and be heard, as long as they remain nonviolent.

·        This right is guaranteed against unreasonable federal and state restrictions and interference. However, local authorities may properly require that large rallies and parades be held only after the police department has been notified. They may also require permits, as long as the requirement is a general one that all organizations must meet.

Historic Supreme Court Decisions

Return to course syllabus

Return to table of contents