|

Academic Affairs 
School of Humanities
 School
of Natural Sciences & Mathematics
 School
of Social Science & Behavioral Studies
 School
of Graduate Studies
 Graduate
Programs
 Policy
on Satisfactory Academic Progress for Financial Aid

University
Strategic Plan University
Mission Vision Philosophy
Goals
 Search
Phone & E-mail Directory 
Academic and Administrative
Offices 
|
Ad-Hoc Committee
Report on The Lincoln University Board of Trustees Distinguished Faculty Award,
January 28, 2006 Award
Assessment Sheets
The Award Criteria The Henry
Cornwell Distinguished Teaching Award will be given to those full time
faculty members who demonstrate excellence and distinction in teaching. Award
candidates must show superior command of subject and their portfolios must include
but not be limited to the evidence of the following: Curriculum
Vitae of nominee Student
evaluation summary sheets (for at least three years prior to consideration for
ward at Lincoln University) Reference
letters from former students (at least two) Peer
evaluation/ reference letters (at least two) Self-evaluation
letter on teaching
The
Hildrus S. Poindexter Distinguished Research Award will be
awarded to those full-time faculty members who demonstrate excellence and distinction
in research and/ or creative works. Award candidates' portfolios must include
but not be limited to the evidence of the following:
Curriculum
Vitae of nominee Published
peer-reviewed papers or other scholarly and creative works (e.g. outstanding art
works or patented inventions) outstanding grants received or one published textbook/
book (in lieu of a textbook/ book, at least two papers or equivalents in the three
years prior to the time of consideration for award at Lincoln University) Self-evaluation
letter on research Inside
(from Lincoln University) peer evaluation/ reference letters (at least one) Outside
peer reference letters (at least one)
The
Soraya M. Coley Distinguished Service Award will be awarded to those
full-time faculty members who demonstrate excellence in service to the university
as well as the community. Award candidates' portfolios must include but not be
limited to the evidence of the following:
Curriculum Vitae of nominee
Service on committees (includes Standing, Ad-Hoc, Departments', etc.) at Lincoln
University with detailed explanation of the role and contributions made (at least
two committees and for at least the prior three years) Peer
evaluation/ reference letters (at least one) Self-evaluation
letter on service Service
to the community or outside reference letters (at least one)
General
Faculty Award Guidelines I. Selection of the schools' Preliminary
Screening Committees
The dean of each school shall name one faculty member and one outstanding senior
student from its school. The
faculty member's name will be chosen alphabetically on a rotational basis from
the division's faculty list to serve for one year and that faculty member will
not be eligible for nomination in that year. In future if available, former recipients
of these awards will be asked to serve on the committee instead.
The Ad-Hoc committee recommends that the senior student with a high GPA to be
chosen from the Honors program's student list.
In case that a faculty from the graduate school is nominated, a graduate student
would be invited to serve on the preliminary committee.
Deadline
for the selection of the schools' preliminary screening committees and distribution
of the nomination forms along with the established award criteria: First Divisional
meeting (may be extended for 2005) II. Review/ Update of the
Evaluation Process
The
screening committees from all schools will have a joint meeting to discuss/ update
the common assessment techniques. These assessment methods will be used to measure
the nominee's qualifications against the established award criteria quantitatively
and/ or qualitatively when appropriate. (The Ad-Hoc committee recommends that
the office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs should arrange this meeting.)
After the first year,
the future panel members may update the evaluation process. Deadline for the review/
update of the assessment techniques: December 15 (may be extended for 2005)
All
full-time faculty members who can meet the award criteria may be nominated by
their peers or can self-nominate. Nominators
can only nominate one faculty per year for an award. Nomination
forms must be signed and forwarded to the nominees' respective schools' deans
by the due date. A
faculty member who receives the award in a given category may not be nominated
for the same award again, but may be nominated for a different award after three
years.
Deadline
for the submission of nomination forms: February 7, 2006 Deadline
for the submission of all the supporting materials: March 7, 2006 IV.
Selection of the top candidates for awards from each school
The
preliminary screening committees from all schools will meet to examine their nominees'
portfolios in each award category against the established evaluative criteria.
The combined panels must conduct their selection work one school at a time. At
this stage, faculty representatives from the other two cognate schools will participate
in the third school's selection process as non-voting members. (The Ad-Hoc committee
recommends that the office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs should arrange
this meeting.) The
committee from a given school will then submit a maximum of one faculty name for
each award to the office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs. This means
in total, the portfolios of a maximum of nine nominees may be submitted.
Deadline
for the preliminary screening committees from each school, to make their selections:
February 28 V. Final Selections of the awardees
The
Vice President for Academic Affairs will call for a meeting together with the
three preliminary screening committee faculty members, and one new outstanding
senior student. The
Ad-Hoc committee recommends that the senior student with the highest GPA to be
chosen from the Honors program's student list. · An additional student may be
included as alternate.
The panel will review the portfolios of all award candidates. The
four-member panel will vote for the nominees in each award category using secret
ballots (provided by the office of the VP). The
Vice President for Academic Affairs may vote in case of a tie. Once
the final selection is made for each award, the names of the prospective awardees
(maximum of three) would be forwarded to the office of the President for approval.
The prospective awardees (zero or one for each category) will be informed of their
selection during the commencement ceremony. Deadline for the panel to examine
the portfolios ahead of time: March 15 Deadline for the meeting of the student(s),
screening committees and the VP to take place: March 31
DISTINGUISHED FACULTY AWARD NOMINATION FORM Name of Candidate for
Award:_________________________________________ Rank: ____________________________________
Department: ______________________________________________ Name
of Award_____________________________________________ Name of previous
award received and year of award:___________________________ Nomination
by: ________________________________________________________ Signature
of Candidate for Award*:__________________________________________ *With
this signature, I accept nomination for the award and agree to submit required
supporting materials (attached herewith) by the stipulated deadline. IMPORTANT
DEADLINES Submission of Nomination Form: February 7, 2006 Submission
of Candidate's Portfolio: March 7, 2006
Lincoln
University of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 1570 Baltimore Pike, P.O. Box
179, Lincoln University, PA 19352 \ (484) 365-8000 Contact
Admissions |